The villagers take in the four soldiers and the boy, and they begin to feel more at home here than they do at home.  Sergeant Stamps (Derek Luke) even starts to befriend the local romantic interest, Renata (Valentina Cervi), while trying to keep the untamed and crude Sgt. Bishop (Michael Ealy) at bay.

But as luck would have it (further confusing the situation) a band of Partisans rolls into town, lead by "The Great Butterfly" Peppi (Pierfrancesco Favino) and also the vaguely familiar looking Rodolfo, and their German prisoner, who just so happens to be the one who let the boy flee the massacre at St. Anna.  (Ironically that's probably a better name for the movie!)  This massacre is a pointless bit of on-screen carnage that serves no purpose really, except to make us squirm, as the Nazis gun down an entire village of men, women, and children.  Yes, its complete with bayonets and babies.  Spike, WTF.

But back to the plot, are you confused yet? Yeah, more head scratching ensues.  The allied command wants a German POW, and so our heroes and the Partisans come to an agreement to take the prisoner to allied command.  But Rodolfo is in fact a German collaborator, and kills Peppi, and ultimately allows the Nazis to walk into town and totally blow away everyone, except for the boy and Hector, who now has "the head."  He goes home, and at his trial is suddenly represented by a very expensive lawyer.  He apparently jumps bail and goes to a caribbean island, where he meets up with the boy again in a touching but confusing reunion....

...but the biggest head scratcher of all, for me, is why oh why, Spike, did you have to turn this into "a black thing."  Throughout, we have to have the segregation issue of the war shoved down our throats like its some kind of medicine that will make the whole thing better.  The entire Louisiana diner scene is just so out of place and forced as to be laughable. 

And the amount of confusion and plot points that go nowhere and mean nothing only muddy the waters further.  A few cases in point:  The cub reporter, the entire marble head plot device, the scene with the Nazi art dealer... Hell, the seemingly compassionate German commander, the entire St. Anna bit, ALL of it that doesn't take place in Italy during the war.

Is this a case of a complex and meaningful book pared down into a shadow of itself on screen?  I've not read James McBride's novel, but it would certainly seem that way.  So many hints at stories that could have been....  I may have to read it just to find out.

But my biggest gripe, Spike, is that if you wanted to make a film which honors the men of the 92nd, you should have done that.  You could have done that without wrapping it in this bizarre package, and without all the strings attached.  Facts are facts.  1944 was still a time of blatant racism and segregation in America, all the whining about it now doesn't change the fact.  It also doesn't change the fact that the men of the 92nd fought and died along with everyone else, even if it was "a white man's war" as is stated throughout the movie.  Like most of them had a choice either?  Come on.

Miracle at St. Anna is a confusing mess that will problably leave you a bit pissed off.  Well, that's something that Spike tends to do anyway.  Oh, and in case you missed it, the guy Hector shoots in the Post Office is the Nazi collaborator Rodolfo.  Yeah, if you're not paying attention, you'll miss it.