<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Battleground (1949)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://warmovieblog.com/archives/1338-battleground-1949.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://warmovieblog.com/archives/1338-battleground-1949.html#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>War Movie Reviews and News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 09:09:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://warmovieblog.com/archives/1338-battleground-1949.html/comment-page-1#comment-8370</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 18:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warmovieblog.com/?p=1338#comment-8370</guid>
		<description>Henry, The first part of my review I clearly say that I really liked the movie, and I agree that it is a great tribute to the Battle of the Bulge vets....

&lt;strong&gt;BUT&lt;/strong&gt; I really felt that well-meaning tribute was &quot;cheapened&quot; (for lack of a better word) &lt;strong&gt;significantly&lt;/strong&gt; by the comedy that was injected into it in what I perceived to be an effort to make the overall package more &quot;mainstream.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Henry, The first part of my review I clearly say that I really liked the movie, and I agree that it is a great tribute to the Battle of the Bulge vets&#8230;.</p>
<p><strong>BUT</strong> I really felt that well-meaning tribute was &#8220;cheapened&#8221; (for lack of a better word) <strong>significantly</strong> by the comedy that was injected into it in what I perceived to be an effort to make the overall package more &#8220;mainstream.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Shaffner</title>
		<link>http://warmovieblog.com/archives/1338-battleground-1949.html/comment-page-1#comment-8369</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Shaffner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 18:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warmovieblog.com/?p=1338#comment-8369</guid>
		<description>Hello! whoever you are who reviewed &quot;Battleground.&quot;

         You are so off-base.  This is certainly the best of the 
  WWII films, and Van Johnson holds it together with his abundant
  talents, humorous ways and spirit and looks of the All-American
  Boy!
          That you, reviewer anon, could not fathom this is just
  symptomatic of your unperceptive views.  

         The Battle Of The Bulge veterans, a hardy breed, still
  around, loved this movie, and continue to watch it to this day.
  Every one of the players is a credit to his craft, and, thanks to
  producer Dore Schary, and his persistance to make the film, it
  exists, today, as a legacy of the Golden Age of MGM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello! whoever you are who reviewed &#8220;Battleground.&#8221;</p>
<p>         You are so off-base.  This is certainly the best of the<br />
  WWII films, and Van Johnson holds it together with his abundant<br />
  talents, humorous ways and spirit and looks of the All-American<br />
  Boy!<br />
          That you, reviewer anon, could not fathom this is just<br />
  symptomatic of your unperceptive views.  </p>
<p>         The Battle Of The Bulge veterans, a hardy breed, still<br />
  around, loved this movie, and continue to watch it to this day.<br />
  Every one of the players is a credit to his craft, and, thanks to<br />
  producer Dore Schary, and his persistance to make the film, it<br />
  exists, today, as a legacy of the Golden Age of MGM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

